Home arrow Forum arrow Research arrow Inital Ribbon Spool, Counterweight arrow Initial Spool/Counterweight craft: LEO to GEO
Initial Spool/Counterweight craft: LEO to GEO
May 12, 2008, 07:07:19 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Initial Spool/Counterweight craft: LEO to GEO  (Read 2935 times)
Hans Rinderknecht
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« on: September 13, 2007, 09:32:47 PM »

In the book "The Space Elevator", the author proposed a laser-powered, plasma-ion thruster onboard the initial craft to get it to its unraveling point at GEO.  I don't have the book in front of me, but I think the Isp for that system was ~40,000. 

This proof-of-concept was demonstrated today of a Photonic Laser Thruster:
http://www.baeinstitute.com/pr1.html

The idea is to provide thrust on a mirror from lasers, which (if kept well focused enough) can be bounced back and forth ~3,000 times to amplify the thrust.  The demonstration (made from off-the-shelf parts, apparently) produced 35 uN of force.  Theoretically these drives have an Isp of 40 million.

My question: could this technology scale up to a level where it could be used to ferry the ribbon seed-craft into GEO?  Some contemplation on materials over at: http://advancednano.blogspot.com/2007/02/photonic-laser-propulsion.html
suggests that the best mirrors (20,000 reflections) would yield 130 mN per kilowatt laser power (0.13 N/kw).  With very powerful, ground-based lasers (like the hundred MW beasts used later to power the lifters) this could translate into significant thrust. 

I don't have a copy of the book handy, but it has info for: 1) laser power, 2) initial launch vehicle weight, 3) thrust from proposed plasma-ion engines.  If someone has the book, I would appreciate that info, to calculate if this is sufficient or better than the proposed design. 


note: this would also displace some (but not all) of the thruster fuel mass, though it would add mass for the mirror.  The thrusters might have to remain on the ship, in order to make the transition into an equatorial orbit from a polar one; though I suppose it's possible that the angle of the driving laser hitting the satellite could be used to change the orbital direction. 

cheers, Hans
Logged
Hans Rinderknecht
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2007, 10:11:53 PM »

Here we go:

1) Laser power: 1 MW (max) (from the NIAC phase II final report, pg. 10)
2) Magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thrusters: "potential for thrust levels of up to 200 N" (from Wikipedia article)

so using the numbers above, a 1 MW laser would provide 130 N with a 20,000 reflection mirror; not quite matching the MPD thruster.  Of course, the thrust continues to increase with more reflections, I think linearly: so 1.5 times better beam control would cause this method to surpass the MPD; as would a more powerful laser.  Aiming and controlling the many reflections while the satellite traverses the sky would, however, be a true feat of engineering.

Perhaps its better to stick with the old idea for now.
cheers, H.
Logged
A_M_Swallow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 739


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2007, 08:16:21 AM »

Force = mass * acceleration
F = m a

The acceleration to rise has to be stronger than gravity say 1.1 g = 1.1 * 9.81
Mass of climber say 20,000 kg

Required force F = 20000 * 1.1 * 9.81 = 215,820 newtons or 216 kN
Logged

Andrew Swallow
AztecBill
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 65


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2008, 05:18:14 PM »

Force = mass * acceleration
F = m a

The acceleration to rise has to be stronger than gravity say 1.1 g = 1.1 * 9.81
Mass of climber say 20,000 kg

Required force F = 20000 * 1.1 * 9.81 = 215,820 newtons or 216 kN

The topic is LEO to GEO. Your delta V from the point of launch has already conquered gravity. Any incremental increase in the orbital VELOCITY will increase your orbit. The acceleration can be very low and still get the job done.
Logged
neil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 875


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2008, 09:38:06 PM »

The climber on an Edwards type ribbon is travening much less than orbital speed, so graviy at 300 kilometers altitude is still about 0.99g The climber must overcome significant gravity until it reaches an altitude of about 35,000 kilometers.
Some beam spreading occurs, so a beam which has traveled a million kilometers total over many reflections requires a prohibitably large mirror at both ends, especially if the mirror aiming is typically in error by one second of arc. At visable light wavelengths, the mirors also require extreem surface precision to avoid scattering most of the light out of the beam. That is not to say the concept is entirely worthless, but we will be disappointed if we expect a big improvemement.  Neil
Logged
A_M_Swallow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 739


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2008, 08:40:08 AM »

The topic is LEO to GEO. Your delta V from the point of launch has already conquered gravity. Any incremental increase in the orbital VELOCITY will increase your orbit. The acceleration can be very low and still get the job done.

The climber is not in LEO.  LEO = Low Earth Orbit.

The climber may be in LEH (Low Earth Height).

LEO and LEH may be the save height but they are not the save speed.

It is the velocity of objects in LEO that cancels out gravity.
Logged

Andrew Swallow
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Login Form

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 12, 2008, 07:07:19 PM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Forgot your password?